Fixing the SWJ appointment process
Mar. 5, 2007Judicial reform is at the forefront of the UB Student Assembly's agenda, and Assembly Chair Nicholas DellaNeve is one of many pressing for restructuring.Concerned over the current appointment process for new justices to the UB Student-Wide Judiciary (SWJ) prompted the call for change.According to the SA Constitution the president appoints justices, though presently, his or her choice can only come from a limited group chosen by the SWJ.DellaNeve and other SA officials believe that this process limits the candidate pool and does not give the SA President true power when it comes to judicial appointments.The SWJ is not known for its impartiality when it comes to adjudicating and has a generally unpopular "guilty until proven innocent" policy.Amending the appointment policy for SWJ justices is necessary, if for nothing more than to prevent inbreeding and the proverbial "friends and family" plan that can indoctrinate organizations that follow similar membership guidelines.On Sunday, DellaNeve explained the specifics of and necessity for these proposed amendments to the SA Constitution.What does the proposed legislation address?The proposed amendment changes the process in which SWJ Justices are appointed into office.












