The G.M.O. you didn't know
Consumer empowerment should be central in G.M.O. labeling debate
The cornerstone of our capitalist market, for better or worse, is consumer choice. And choice is meaningless if consumers are not able to make informed decisions.
The debate over genetically modified organisms (G.M.O.'s) used in our foods has been long and controversial with those decrying "frankenfood" railing against those portraying the process as the savior from food shortages and high food prices.
The battle over labeling these foods has been gaining significant traction in recent weeks, with states like Colorado putting labeling initiatives on their ballots for the upcoming elections.
The process of genetically modifying food involves introducing new genes into foods for perceived benefits, such as drought-resistance, improved nutritional value and the ability to withstand herbicides.
While these are doubtlessly beneficial for consumers' pocketbooks and farmers' finances, there has been long-standing opposition to G.M.O.'s and questions regarding its impact on health.
The science has remained generally inconclusive, leading to claims that research doesn't demonstrate the safety of G.M.O.'s.
But a recent effort by Italian researchers who cataloged 1,783 studies of G.M.O. safety revealed "there is no credible evidence that G.M.O.'s pose any unique threat to the environment or the public's health," according to an article by Forbes.
Credible threat or not, given that genetic modification is a contentious issue, labeling should be required to respect the desires of those who wish to know what they are purchasing.
Currently, no federal requirement exists to label foods with G.M.O.'s in them.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) claims because there is "no significant difference between bioengineered foods and 'natural' food," labeling is not necessary.
Whether genetically modified food poses an imminent threat to the consumer's health, the process surely constitutes a significant change to the food in question.
Beyond these considerations, however, the role of consumer choice is central to why G.M.O. foods should be labeled.
Claims against labeling often cite the sense of false danger that would arise if foods were labeled. The thinking goes that consumers, falling back on preconceived anxieties regarding G.M.O.'s, will not purchase foods labeled as such.
Surely the role of misinformation and lack of understanding exists in regards to food production generally, and genetically modified foods particularly. This should not, however, impede efforts to provide information on whether G.M.O.'s are in a product.
Though we should all take greater time to understand our food and its ingredients, this begins with first having access to information regarding what is in the food we eat.
Regulation requiring labeling of genetically modified foods would empower consumers to make more informed decisions about the food they purchase, allowing for competition in the market that reveals actual consumer preferences.
Furthermore, labeling would encourage greater consumer understanding of G.M.O.'s in general, pushing the concept into public conversation on a broader scale.
Knowledge of what we consume is, fundamentally, a right that has gone largely overlooked in past decades. Whether the constituent parts of the food we eat are deemed healthy by federal regulators does not and should not determine if we know what goes into the food we eat.
Labeling of the presence of G.M.O.'s is a right for citizens and consumers.
The essence of our economic system lies in informed consumer choice. But first we have to know what we're choosing.
Get Top Stories Delivered Weekly
From Around the Web
More ubspectrum News Articles
Recent ubspectrum News Articles
Discuss This Article
MOST POPULAR UBSPECTRUM
GET TOP STORIES DELIVERED WEEKLY
FOLLOW OUR NEWSPAPER
LATEST UBSPECTRUM NEWS
- Buffalo stunned by Ohio after last-second basket
- Bulls fall to Central Michigan 84-73
- Weird Al to come to UB this summer
- Bulls defeat Miami Ohio behind career-game by Moss
- Rachael Gregory transfers from UB
- Buffalo routs Northern Illinois in return to Alumni Arena
- Bulls’ offense sputters in a 78-68 loss to Western Michigan
FROM AROUND THE WEB
- Give Your Kitchen a New Look With a Lighting Update
- Garden Project Spreads Its Roots in Urban Areas
- The Need for Voluntary Insurance Is on the Rise
- How to Be More Productive During Your Business Flights
- It's Never too Late to Start Living Healthy
- Revive tus objetivos de verte saludable en 2015
- Debunking Common Tax-Filing Myths
- With Help From Chile, Blueberries Stay Fresh All Winter
- Small Fixtures Make a Big Design Impact
- Keeping the Workplace in Proper Alignment
COLLEGE PRESS RELEASES
- ASCO Numatics Announces 2015 Industrial Automation Engineering Scholarships
- Coffee Club Goes Viral With Members Earning Free Starbucks Cards
- UniversitySpot.com Introduces Extensive, Curated List of Free Online Courses for Winter 2015
- NEEBO COLLEGE TEXTBOOK SAVINGS TIP: SELL EARLY, BUY EARLY AND SAVE BIG
- Draper University's Tim Draper Hosts YouNoodle Live Featuring Student Entrepreneurs From Around The World