The Spectrum

Why Put a Bumper Sticker on a Ferrari?

By LISA KHOURY

Asst. News Editor

Published: Saturday, January 28, 2012

Updated: Thursday, February 2, 2012

Lisa

Spectrum file photo

DISCLOSURE: THIS LINK WAS POSTED AT 4 p.m. ON 02/02/12


I get it. It's the 21st century. You're cool, you're rebellious, you're cutting edge, you have a point to prove, and you're a woman. Awesome.

Ladies, I know you're at least at the legal age of making your own decisions, but before you decide to get a tattoo, allow me to let you in on a little secret. A secret you may have not fully realized yet thus far in your life. What you must understand is, as women, we are – naturally – beautiful creatures.

Seriously, though. Your body literally has the ability to turn heads. Guys drool over us. We hold some serious power in our hands, because – as corny as this sounds – we hold the world's beauty.

But something girls seem to forget nowadays, or maybe have not been taught, is that women hold the world's class and elegance in their hands, as well. So what's more attractive than a girl with a nice body? I'll tell you what: a girl with class. Looks may not last, but class does. And so do tattoos.

An elegant woman does not vandalize the temple she has been blessed with as her body. She appreciates it. She flaunts it. She's not happy with it? She goes to the gym. She dresses it up in lavish, fun, trendy clothes, enjoying trips to the mall with her girlfriends. She accentuates her legs with high heels. She gets her nails done. She enjoys the finer things in life, all with the body she was blessed with.

But marking it up with ink? That's just not necessary.

I'm not here to say a girl should walk around flaunting her body like it's her job – that's just degrading. Instead of getting a tattoo, a more productive use of your time would be improving and appreciating the body you have been given, not permanently engraving it.

Can you get meaning out of a tattoo? Arguably. If you want to insert ink into your skin as a symbol for something greater than yourself, then maybe you are proving a point to yourself or the rest of the world.

But at the end of the day, are you really a happier person? Has this tattoo, for instance, caused you to learn something new about yourself? Has it challenged you? Has it led you to self-growth? Nothing comes out of getting a tattoo. You get a tattoo, and that's it. You do something productive, though, and you see results. That's a genuine, satisfying change in life. Not ink.

Invest your time, money, and effort into a gym membership, or yoga classes, or new clothes, or experimenting with different hairstyles if you're craving something new with your body, not a tattoo.

I promise, it will be a much more rewarding experience, and you won't find yourself in a rut when your future grandkids ask you what's up with the angel wings on your upper back as you're in the middle of giving them a life lesson on the importance of values and morals.

God knows the last thing this world needs is another generation of kids questioning their basic values and morals.

 

Email: lisa.khoury@ubspectrum.com

Comments

147 comments
Anonymous
Fri Apr 6 2012 11:42
High heals are more damaging to a woman's body than tattoos ever could be!
Anonymous
Wed Mar 28 2012 12:11
I find it entertaining that the people who feel the author is saying those that have body art are unattractive are getting all hot and bothered, and then make comments about the author's physical appearance. Hi pot. Meet kettle.

While I do not agree with everything that was written in this article, I feel no need to attack the author for expressing her opinion. Many people may not agree with what she has written; does that warrant calling her vulgar names and calling her ugly? No. This might come as a shock to some people, but not everyone will have the same views as you. That does not mean that they never should have been born, or that they are filth. It means that they have a mind of their own. Crazy thought.

Everyone who is posting reactionary comments needs to get over themselves. Tearing another person down for their opinon is a horrible thing to do, and honestly, it's pretty juvenile.

Tattooed Educated Mother
Tue Mar 27 2012 19:22
How ignorant can some people be. Just because we choose not to conform to her idea of normality. My ink work is art. It is an expression of ME. My children may one day choose to have ink on them or not. Have gauged earrings or not. Choose to conform or not. I owe no apologies or explanations for what I CHOOSE to do to my body. This is one of the problems in today's feeling that what we are doing is wrong. Classless and Worthless? No I have memories I dug into with each sitting, some painful and some amazing and wonderful. But the common bond is being able to look in the mirror and have a positive feeling toward what I have placed on my body. How are her children going to feel toward their judgmental and ignorant mother?

I teach my children we are ALL different and just because we do not like or agree with the choices of others does not mean we need to make a decision about the type of person they are.

Anonymous
Sat Mar 24 2012 14:07
My tattoos helped me in my recovery after suffering from eating disorders for years. At the end of the day, am I really a happier person? Has this tattoo, for instance, caused me to learn something new about myself? Has it challenged me? Has it led me to self-growth?

Yes. All of the above.

That's something high heels and manicures and "trendy" clothes and "the finer things" have never done for me. Materialism isn't the answer.

You are offensive.

Anonymous
Wed Mar 21 2012 13:17
The only difference between tattooed people and non-tattooed people is tattooed people don't care if you are not tattooed.
Inked Saltire
Wed Mar 21 2012 08:50
No, no no no, to all the people claiming that the backlash the author received was a result of "butthurt" or unnecessary anger from the tattooed community, you're completely missing the point. I agree this is a small article in a newspaper, but it was visible enough to be read and objected to by many.

The entire article is a prime example of what is known as "body-shaming". It essentially a) breaks down a woman's worth entirely to just her aesthetics or beauty, b) assumes only one model of beauty, and encourages women to indulge in other "more acceptable" cosmetic enhancements to achieve said model (notice the automatic assumption that this includes changing your shape/weight) , and c) hypocritically assumes a tattoo, which is a lasting reminder of the reasons behind the tattoo, is less meaningful and gives less self-growth than changing your hairstyle and getting your nails done (which also, arguably, "vandalizes" the "temple" that is the female body).

For a personal anecdote, I have one tattoo. It is that of my country's flag, or what would be my country's flag if we were allowed to be our own country. Patriotic tats are sometimes seen as overdone, but for me it's a powerful reminder of my own identity, a part of me that will never go away. I got it just before I went to live in England for a year. Every time I catch sight of it, I am reminded about my time in England and the attitudes of everyone I met there, both positive and negative, and of the lessons I learned as a result. So, self-growth? I'd say so.

This has all been said before, many times. And yes, the author is young. But the more this sinks in, the greater chance of the author seeing why this marginalises a lot of women, and perpetuates a lot of the objectification a lot of women face. Maybe eventually the author will learn to interact openly with women with different lifestyles and beliefs as herself.

But please, please, the next time you do an opinion article, please don't hide the internalised sexism behind a false message of empowerment. It's... well, a bit insulting.

Brittany Nicole
Fri Feb 17 2012 00:40
My role model in life was my great grandma. She had nothing negative to say towards people because nothing positive would come of it. She was kind, gentle, went out of her way to put a smile on people's faces, cared more about others than herself, and an overall wonderful woman.

Two of my eight tattoos are dedicated to her. One of a koi fish (she had a koi pond) with the signature she put on all of her artwork and the other that is a sketch of a bird on a branch I found when looking through her stuff after she passed. I'm sorry, but you simply cannot tell me a tattoo does nothing for someone. I look at these tattoos on a daily person and am not able to feel a bit at peace with her death, but also allow myself to be reminded of the type of person I want to be - one with the same positive and caring attitude she had. Sorry, but on that point, you're wrong. My tattoos have led to self-growth.

PS - I have never wanted children so I won't ever have to explain my tattoos to my grandchildren but if I did, I would enjoy telling them the wonderful stories and reasoning behind each and every one of them. Why would I have shame in that?

Beauty in Everyone
Wed Feb 15 2012 14:29
What bothers me the most about this opinion piece is not her stance against tattoos. But, rather, her intimation that only women can be beautiful, classy, or elegant. She implies that women are the only people of beauty on this planet. Her implied sexism destroys any argument should could make.
UB Student
Fri Feb 10 2012 21:37
I'm aware this is an opinion article, but I know there are also more eloquent and sophisticated ways to express your opinion without making it sound like one giant, angry diary rant. I don't fancy tattoos either (shocker), but I felt that you went about expressing your feelings the wrong way and forgot that anything published online or in a newspaper is also part of the public domain. I am sorry for all the negative attention you have received from this, but try to take it in stride, listen to the constructive criticism, and build off it to enhance your writing career. One thing you can certainly take from this, is the experience you received and the lesson learned. This isn't the end for you, Lisa, and I wish you the best with your future, just remember who your audience is.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 9 2012 22:40
As an actual UB student who READ THE PAPER (and not online), I think you people actually need to know where this article was. It wasn't on the front page. It wan an opinion article, against a writer who supported tattoos.

Everyone keeps saying what she did was 'classless' and 'a disgrace'. I think you all are being classless for these comments. What you clearly fail to realize is that the Spectrum is a COLLEGE paper and this was written by a COLLEGE student. This is not the New York Times or the Washington Post. The amount of backlash for an opinion article in a college newspaper is absolutely pathetic and embarrassing.

Lisa Khoury, I hope that you do not give up Journalism. Everyone here at UB is behind you and supports you, even if it's against people with tattoos. UB STANDS TOGETHER.

Anonymous
Wed Feb 8 2012 18:34
'Nothing comes out of getting a tattoo.'
Really? How would you know if you've never gotten one? How do you know my tattoo doesn't serve as a reminder every single day of my life that I am better than self-harm? That every time I have the impulse, it's there to remind me that I deserve to love myself, to be healthy.
Tell me nothing came from that experience. Please.

Tattoos are an individual choice, and no one has the right to impose their beliefs one way or another on anyone else. And no one has the right to judge anyone on whether or not they have tattoos (except for your employer, who can choose how they want their business represented. But I don't think that's the case here, am I right?). Your instinct may be that a tattooed person is a classless individual... but is that right? Or is that just what you've been conditioned to think.

And by the way, as a woman, regardless of the fact that I am a tattooed woman, I am wholly offended by this article. I am more than a head turner, I am also intelligent, and possess the ability to exist without a man to make sandwiches for.

KIUSCG
Wed Feb 8 2012 15:36
This is distasteful to say the least. I wish no ill harm on anyone but I do hope this and your fake apology don't go unnoticed in the career path that you chose. People who have tattoos and get things such as portraits of loved ones or military careers are never frowned upon. We as women are accepted for who we are no matter what we look like or what tattoos we have. You act like every woman in the world who has tattoos gets distasteful things THIS IS NOT TRUE. You need to look in the mirror and make sure that before you post things you can live with the regret. The wording used in this column is very disrespectful and insulting; you have an utter disregard to how other people view the world. Yes, this is the twenty first century, it is a different time where different things are excepted if people don't like it then they don't have to look or pay attention. I don't mind that you are expressing your view points because this is a free country and we all have a right to express our self, that is a given right just like those of us whom choose to get tattoos that is our RIGHT! Some of us with tattoos are successful women who happen to have family and friends think they are very elegant and classy. My biggest problem with your column is your lack of justification. I am right there with Corvo, I am a mother and I have tattoos, I am not setting a bad example because my kids know there are rules. Your post along with everything else in magazines makes children think they have to have the most expensive clothes that they have to shop at the mall or get their nails done or be high maintenance to be beautiful. This is very far from the truth, very far. People with tattoos do not have lower morals just because we choose to express ourselves differently. This is like you saying if you get your ears pierced you are tampering with the women's body to be elegant or classy. Tattoos are in the same concept whether you like it or not. Your point of view is based on a young naive high school students view not real life. There is a lot more going on in the world related to raising young women than having tattoo's write about something really worth your time, and not rubbish such as this where you will have millions of viewers whom find it distasteful.

Although i dont really care for your response due to the irritation you have caused my email is angelize114@hotmail.com

Anonymous
Tue Feb 7 2012 15:58
As a person who doesn't have tattoos, I still find this article, and her subsequent "apology" to be quite offensive. The tattoo portion of this article is almost secondary to the misogyny and sexism going on here. Lisa clearly doesn't value herself as a person, and as a result doesn't value any women. She derisively writes how we should go to the gym and traipse around in new clothes constantly in order to feel a sense of self worth. Honey, people don't always get tattoos for attention, or to paraphrase you "decorate their temple", sometimes, and hold on to your 1950's pillbox hat, they get them for themselves. For deeper personal reasons that a haircut could never suffice to demonstrate. I really think the people defending you on here are friends or family because I sincerely doubt anyone reading this from an outside view thinks so highly of you as to defend this tripe. How are you even on a newspaper? Was the only mandate that you be able to partially string a sentence together? I hope you enjoy the backlash, because it is so incredibly well deserved.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 7 2012 15:49
Are you actually this ignorant? You get nothing out of a tattoo but you get something out of a haircut? You are so pathetically pitiful at writing that you almost aren't even worth replying to. You really deserved the backlash you got and frankly I hope it hurt. Misogyny in female form is truly a sick and sad thing. Are you trying to set women back half a dozen decades? Maybe it's your life's goal to go to the gym and and buy new clothes, that's fine. But how dare you preach that all women should do those things in lieu of getting a tattoo? If you had merely stated an argument based solely on your personal reasons for not wanting one, that would have been fine. Not everyone needs to get tattooed, but your view on people who have gotten them is disgusting and ignorant. Also, Ferrari? We can all see your photo sweetheart. Maybe try something a little closer to the truth next time. From all sides.
Kim
Mon Feb 6 2012 14:42
Congratulations on your feeble attempt to completely bury any landmarks that were reached by the feminist movement. Not only does your article blatantly objectify women, but it also pits you against other women who, at one point in time, were in the same damn struggle together. If our only two options are to be fools with tattoos or fools without, I guess I know the column in which you fall.

As for me, I have no tattoos. I'd rather be covered in them than be closed minded.

Nothing disappears on the internet. This article is your tattoo.

Jason Tung
Sun Feb 5 2012 13:02
Read my post very carefully , for it is a comment upon the articul , and not as you propose, an attack upon the author. regardless of how infernally ridicules her views seem to be
BW
Sat Feb 4 2012 18:39
Whenever commenters react in such an over-the-top negative manner such as this, it is clear that the writer of the article has swerved far too close to exposing a terrible truth and must be silenced forthwith. For the tattooed, acknowledging the reality that you have made the disastrous and permanent mistake of advertising to the entire world for all time that you are a shallow, vain and self-absorbed twit with terrible judgement is simply too much to bear. The messenger must be sacrificed at all costs. Hence this response.

The writer has also learned a valuable lesson about the leftist masses (Remember, Tea Party: no tats. OWS: nothing but tats). They are ruthless, bloodthirsty and totally devoid of any class or basic human decency. Expose them at your own risk.

Nobody with a tat who was confident and at peace with his/her choice would react in such a rabid manner.

Anonymous
Sat Feb 4 2012 18:19
Dumbest article I have read in a long time.
proper grown up
Sat Feb 4 2012 15:59
Moron.
anxiousgeek
Sat Feb 4 2012 15:57
"But at the end of the day, are you really a happier person? Has this tattoo, for instance, caused you to learn something new about yourself? Has it challenged you? Has it led you to self-growth? Nothing comes out of getting a tattoo. You get a tattoo, and that's it. You do something productive, though, and you see results. That's a genuine, satisfying change in life. Not ink."

I could not disagree more. Tattoos are obviously not your thing, but for some of us, it's more, it's something else. It's art.

And you come across as terribly shallow and superficial.

View full site